ERA BARU PEMBELAJARAN IPA SD/MI: Integrasi Deep Learning dan Differentiated Learning
Synopsis
Selama ini pembelajaran IPA di tingkat SD/MI kerap terjebak pada pola hafalan dan latihan rutin yang kurang memberi ruang bagi pemahaman mendalam serta pengembangan potensi setiap siswa. Kondisi ini membuat banyak peserta didik hanya mengenali konsep di permukaan, tanpa mampu mengaitkan dengan kehidupan nyata atau menggunakannya untuk memecahkan masalah. Selain itu, keberagaman karakter, minat, dan kemampuan siswa sering kali belum terakomodasi dengan baik, sehingga proses belajar belum sepenuhnya inklusif.
Buku ini hadir sebagai jawaban atas tantangan tersebut. Dengan pendekatan deep learning, siswa diajak memahami IPA secara lebih komprehensif dan aplikatif, sedangkan differentiated learning memberi ruang agar setiap anak dapat belajar sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan potensinya. Buku ini menawarkan kerangka teori, strategi, serta contoh nyata di kelas, sehingga guru memiliki panduan konkret untuk mewujudkan pembelajaran IPA yang lebih bermakna, kreatif, dan relevan dengan tuntutan abad ke-21.
References
ARTIKEL JURNAL
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2018). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017
Anderson, R. D. (2021). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015171124982
Andrade, H. L., & Du, Y. (2019). Self-assessment in education. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 105–131.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2013). Technology mapping: An approach for developing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 42(2), 199–221.
https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.48.2.e
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29.
Bell, R. L., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction: Assessing the inquiry level of classroom activities. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30–33.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2020). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 369–398.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2020). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.
https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.31.1.k1j8584x33045g13
Bruner, J. S. (2019). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.
Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11(1–2), 87–110.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011143116306
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2020). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2021). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260701828101
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.007
Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 489–497.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.05.005
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00025-7
Driver, R., & Bell, B. (1986). Students’ thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view. School Science Review, 67(240), 443–456.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016
Ertmer, P. A., & Simons, K. D. (2006). Jumping the implementation hurdle for project-based learning: A survey of middle school teachers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1005
Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: Drivers, developments and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5–6), 304–317.
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Fleming, N. D., & Mills, C. (1992). Not another inventory, rather a catalyst for reflection. To Improve the Academy, 11(1), 137–155.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.1992.tb00213.x
Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult Education Quarterly, 48(1), 18–33.
https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369704800103
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hammer, D., & Schifter, D. (2001). Practices of inquiry in teaching and research. Cognition and Instruction, 19(4), 441–478.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1904_2
Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), 51–72.
Hattie, J., & Yates, G. (2023). Visible learning and the science of how we learn (2nd ed.). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885025
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2020). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 55(3), 27–35.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Interaction Book Company.
Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613
Kirschenbaum, H., & Jourdan, A. (2020). The current status of Carl Rogers and the person-centered approach. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 42(1), 37–51.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Kuhn, J., & Vogt, P. (2013). Smartphones and tablets in physics education. Physics Education, 48(1), 1–7.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/48/1/1
Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. (2010). Seven essentials for project-based learning. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 34–37.
Loyens, S. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 411–427.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1976.tb02980.x
Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59(1), 14–19.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.14
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry-based science instruction—What is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20347
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1993). Five standards of authentic instruction. Educational Leadership, 50(7), 8–12.
Niess, M. L. (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 509–523.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006
Paulson, F. L., Paulson, P. R., & Meyer, C. A. (1991). What makes a portfolio a portfolio? Educational Leadership, 48(5), 60–63.
Pellegrino, J. W., & Quellmalz, E. S. (2010). Perspectives on the integration of technology and assessment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 119–134.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782565
Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Current research on the social and emotional development of gifted and talented students: Good news and future possibilities. Psychology in the Schools, 41(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10144
Rock, M. L., Gregg, M., Ellis, E., & Gable, R. A. (2008). REACH: A framework for differentiating classroom instruction. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 31–47.
https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.52.2.31-47
Roth, W. M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 127–152.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300203
Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: Slowing down may be a way of speeding up! Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718603700110
Rutten, N., van Joolingen, W. R., & van der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.017
Sadler, D. R. (2010). Beyond feedback: Developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541015
Santangelo, T., & Tomlinson, C. A. (2012). The application of differentiated instruction in postsecondary environments: Benefits, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 307–323.
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Schmidt, H. G., & Moust, J. H. (1995). What makes a tutor effective? A structural equation modeling approach to learning in problem-based curricula. Academic Medicine, 70(8), 708–714.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199508000-00015
Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: What works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x
Sengupta, P., & Wilensky, U. (2009). Programming for computational thinking: Integrating computation in science learning. Communications of the ACM, 52(8), 49–52.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1536616.1536635
Shavelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Gao, X. (1993). Sampling variability of performance assessments. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30(3), 215–232.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1993.tb00424.x
Shearer, C. B. (2020). Multiple intelligences in teaching and education: Lessons learned from neuroscience. Journal of Intelligence, 8(3), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8030038
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30–32.
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569
Toshalis, E., & Nakkula, M. J. (2012). Motivation, engagement, and student voice. Jobs for the Future.
VanLehn, K. (2006). The behavior of tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(3), 227–265.
Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge – A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109–121.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x
Wendell, K. B., & Rogers, C. (2013). Engineering design in elementary school: Examining the effects of a curriculum integrating engineering, children’s literature, and science. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 3(2), 15–28.
https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1073
Wieman, C. E., Adams, W. K., & Perkins, K. K. (2008). PhET: Simulations that enhance learning. Science, 322(5902), 682–683.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161948
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations. Science Education, 92(5), 941–967.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20259
Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
SUMBER BUKU
Ainsworth, S. (2018). Multiple representations and multimedia learning. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 427–441). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617572-10
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Armstrong, T. (2017). Multiple intelligences in the classroom (4th ed.). ASCD.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Springer Publishing.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Southern Illinois University School of Medicine.
Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. McGraw-Hill.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Jossey-Bass.
Boss, S., & Larmer, J. (2015). The project-based learning handbook for middle school teachers. Buck Institute for Education.
Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. Routledge.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.
Carr, N. (2020). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
Chen, J. Q., & Gardner, H. (2005). Assessment based on multiple intelligences theory. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 335–350). Guilford Press.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning (4th ed.). Wiley.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119239086
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2008). Learning and leading with habits of mind: 16 essential characteristics for success. ASCD.
Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20157
Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Dede, C., & Dunleavy, M. (2014). Augmented reality teaching and learning. Harvard Education Press.
Dede, C., & Richards, J. (2012). Digital teaching platforms. Teachers College Press.
Deterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke, L. E., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Toward a definition. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI gamification workshop (pp. 12–15). ACM Press.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979575
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Doidge, N. (2007). The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. Penguin Books.
Dufour, R., & Eaker, R. (2010). Professional learning communities at work. Solution Tree Press.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching students through their individual learning styles: A practical approach. Reston Publishing.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Palgrave Macmillan.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. Pearson.
Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons in theory and practice. Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (3rd ed.). Basic Books.
Gentner, D., & Smith, L. A. (2012). Analogical reasoning. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd ed., pp. 130–136). Academic Press.
Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1995). Investigative work in the science curriculum. Open University Press.
Halloun, I. A. (2006). Modeling theory in science education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5494-1
Hart, D. (1994). Authentic assessment: A handbook for educators. Addison-Wesley.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2013). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12635
Kirkpatrick, J. D., & Kirkpatrick, W. K. (2016). Kirkpatrick’s four levels of training evaluation. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Cambridge Adult Education.
Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Kornhaber, M. L., & Gardner, H. (2006). Critical thinking across multiple intelligences. In S. Maclure & P. Davies (Eds.), Learning to think: Thinking to learn (pp. 147–170). Pergamon Press.
Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Review Press.
Krajcik, J., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd ed., pp. 275–297). Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.017
Kuhlthau, C. C. (2004). Seeking meaning: A process approach to library and information services (2nd ed.). Libraries Unlimited.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project based learning. Buck Institute for Education.
Lawson, A. E. (2003). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Wadsworth Publishing.
Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Internet environments for science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47217-1_4
Markham, T., Larmer, J., & Ravitz, J. (2003). Project based learning handbook. Buck Institute for Education.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (3rd ed.). Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Mayer, R. E. (2014). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Prentice Hall.
McDermott, L. C., & Shaffer, P. S. (2012). Tutorials in introductory physics (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Medina, J. (2014). Brain rules: 12 principles for surviving and thriving at work, home, and school (2nd ed.). Pear Press.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. Jossey-Bass.
National Academy of Engineering. (2010). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology (3rd ed.). International Technology Education Association.
National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165
Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en
Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving (3rd ed.). Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Piaget, J. (1952). The construction of reality in the child. Basic Books.
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
Popham, W. J. (2017). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (8th ed.). Pearson.
Popper, K. R. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
Prensky, M. (2012). From digital natives to digital wisdom: Hopeful essays for 21st century learning. Corwin Press.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. SRHE/Open University Press.
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Redish, E. F. (2003). Teaching physics with the physics suite. Wiley.
Redish, E. F., & Kuo, E. (2015). Language of physics, language of math: Disciplinary culture and dynamic epistemology. Science & Education, 24(5–6), 561–590.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9749-7
Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Charles E. Merrill.
Rothstein, D., & Santana, L. (2011). Make just one change: Teach students to ask their own questions. Harvard Education Press.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2020). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Siemens, G., & Tittenberger, P. (2009). Handbook of emerging technologies for learning. University of Manitoba.
Stringer, E. T. (2013). Action research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Buck Institute for Education.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2017). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (3rd ed.). ASCD.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wagner, T. (2014). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don’t teach the new survival skills our children need (2nd ed.). Basic Books.
Westbrook, R. B. (1991). John Dewey and American democracy. Cornell University Press.
Wieman, C. (2017). Improving how universities teach science: Lessons from the science education initiative. Harvard University Press.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). ASCD.
Wong, H. K., & Wong, R. T. (2018). The first days of school: How to be an effective teacher (5th ed.). Harry K. Wong Publications.
World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. World Economic Forum. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8340918
Zull, J. E. (2002). The art of changing the brain: Enriching the practice of teaching by exploring the biology of learning. Stylus Publishing.
